6.1 Quantum Potential
Interpretation
The
same idea is depicted in a slightly
different terminology in Quantum
Potential Interpretation. Bohm (D.
Bohm: A Suggested Interpretation of
the Quantum Theory in Terms of
'Hidden' Variables, II and I.
Phys.Rev. 85 (1952) 166.) and
DeBroglie (L. DeBroglie: "Nonlinear
Wave Mechanics" Elsevier Science,
Amsterdam (1960).) on the other hand
assume a causal or ensemble
interpretation.
According to Bohm (1892-1987), the
wave function supplies an additional
potential - the Quantum-Potential.
This potential, when inserted into
the Hamilton-Jacobi-equation of
classical physics, leads to
well-determined trajectories of the
individual particles. Thus there is
a second wave that determines a
precise position for the particle at
any particular time. In this theory,
there is some 'hidden variable' that
determines the precise position of
the photon.
For
the case of the
double-slit-experiment, each
particle has a well-defined
trajectory and passes through one of
the two slits. However the particles
do produce interference pattern
because it is guided by the quantum
potential. Thus classical trajectory
depends on the quantum potential,
which is dependent on the external
situation. It is not possible, to
predict or to select a specific
trajectory for the particle by
controlling physical conditions such
as the slit width or source distance
or screen distance.
This
theory was thwarted when John von
Neumann (1903-1957) a well-known
mathematician in 1932 proved that
this theory was impossible. John
Bell (1928-1990) in 1966 discovered
that the proof had holes. According
to Bell there is a definite
possibility of a quantum guiding
potential and possible hidden
variables -- but only if particles
could communicate faster than light
(this is called 'nonlocality').
In
1982 at the University of Paris,
Aspect and his team discovered that
under certain circumstances
subatomic particles such as
electrons are able to
instantaneously communicate with
each other regardless of the
distance separating them. But we
cannot use this method to
communicate.
Bohm's
theory was that the second wave was
indeed faster than light, and
moreover it did not get weaker with
distance but instantly permeated the
entire universe, acting as a guide
for the movement of the photon. This
is why it is sometimes called the
'pilot wave'.
"Classical physics provided a mirror
that reflected only the objective
structure of the human being who was
the observer. There is no room in
this scheme for his mental process
that is thus regarded as separate or
as a mere 'epiphenomenon' of the
objective processes. ... [Through
the] mirror [of quantum physics] the
observer sees 'himself' both
physically and mentally in the
larger setting of the universe as a
whole. ... More broadly one could
say that through the human being,
the universe is making a mirror to
observe itself." -- Bohm and Hiley,
The Undivided Universe, pg.
389
In
this beautiful approach, the
trajectory of the path is determined
by the state function, which in turn
is determined by the situation.
Again we are presented with the
total unity of the virtual and the
visible. We cannot distinguish God’s
decrees and purposes apart from the
unfolding drama of human reaction
and history. God changes his plan
depending on the historical
development and history develops
according to God’s plan. Do we have
evidence for this? I believe that
the whole Biblical history is just
that. If God wanted to implement
salvation in his own way without
regard to history, it would have
been simple, direct and
instantaneous. There would have been
no worsening of sin or suffering nor
there was any necessity of cross. It
is this intertwining of the Quantum
potential with the situation that
causes the process development.
Quantum physics tells us the atomic
"particles" of which we are made are
not the ultimate physical reality.
There is an ultimately physical
reality with infinite latent
potentialities which are realized in
context in interactions. These
potentialities are described by the
"wavefunction" or "state function"
In the
view of Bohm, subatomic particles
such as electrons are not simple,
structureless particles, but highly
complex, dynamic entities. Their
motion is determined not only by the
external classical forces, but also
by more subtle forces which are not
perceptible by senses. These are the
quantum potentials. The quantum
potential pervades all space and
provides direct connections between
quantum systems. In 1959
Aharonov-Bohm (AB) discovered the
where electrons were able to sense
the magnetic field of nearby regions
even when they were in the region of
zero field. It confirms that we
cannot really isolate a system from
the rest of the cosmos. We now have
sufficient proof for nonlocal
effects in the EPR paradox and
subsequent experiments, which we
will discuss later.
Jean-Paul Vigier and several other
physicists at the Institut Henri
Poincaré in France, explain the
quantum potential in terms of
fluctuations in underlying ether. He
explains it in terms of a stream
with disturbances as follows:
“On
this stream, one may see an
ever-changing pattern of vortices,
ripples, waves, splashes, etc.,
which evidently have no independent
existence as such. Rather, they are
abstracted from the flowing
movement, arising and vanishing in
the total process of the flow. Such
transitory subsistence as may be
possessed by these abstracted forms
implies only a relative independence
or autonomy of behavior, rather than
absolutely independent existence as
ultimate substances. (Page 48). “We
must learn to view everything as
part of "Undivided Wholeness
in Flowing Movement."
(Ibid., p. 11.) “
(David
Bohm, Wholeness and the
Implicate Order,
Routledge & Kegan Paul, London,
Boston, 1980.)
Bohm
suggests that the whole universe can
be thought of as a kind of giant,
flowing hologram, or
holomovement. What we notice
in mundane world is only a
projection from higher dimensional
levels of reality. Just as a
hologram records the entire image in
every part of the film, the image of
universe is reflected in every point
matter. Bohm suggests that the
quantum potential is itself
organized and guided by a super
quantum potential, representing a
second implicate order, or super
implicate order ad infinitum.
Higher implicate orders organize the
lower ones, which in turn influence
the higher.
6.2
The Hartree and Hartree-Fock
Approximation
The Hartree Fock Approximation is
what is known as a Self-Consistent
Field Method (SCF). The original
Hartree method considers the total
wavefunction of the system as a
product of independent one particle
wave function. For the electrons,
for example, the wavefunction is an
antisymmetrized determinantal
product of one-electron orbitals
known to scientists as the "Slater"
determinant.
The Hartree method
allows us to to change the 3N
dimensional equation into a 3
dimensional equation for each
electron . This equation depends on
the wavefunctions of the other
electrons but can be solved in a
self consistent way using the
variational principle and iterating.
Schrödinger equation is transformed
into a set of Hartree or
Hartree-Fock equations. The
method of approximation is to start
with the simple superposition
principle (use a product wave
function of individual particles)
without interaction. This is
equivalent to totally independent
individuals. One particle is then
taken and the potential in which it
moves is calculated by freezing the
distribution of all other particles
and treating their averaged
interaction as potential. The
solution to this will give the first
approximation. It is then repeated
in sequence for all particles over
and over allowing for all forms of
interactions.
There
are two broad categories of such
approaches: those based on
perturbation theory and those based
on the variational principle. The
main problem of the Hartree-Fock and
DFT methods is the underlying
treatment of electron correlation.
6.3 Born-Oppenheimer Approximation
The
Born-Oppenheimer approximation is
the first of several approximations
used in solving Schrödinger equation
for manybody systems. In the case of
an atom it separates electron and
nuclear motion based on the idea
that nuclear mass is so much larger
than electron mass that the nuclei
are basically "fixed" particles.
This
equation shows the full Hamiltonian
for a molecular system.
This can then be converted into the
corresponding Schrödinger Equation.
Then
the Hamiltonian for the nucleus will
contain the vibrational energy added
to effective potential energy due to
the presence of the electronic
system surrounding it.
The
translation of this concept into
theological terms is direct and
straightforward. In theology the
fixed factor is God. However in the
experiential realm of human
existence the Saguna Brahman (God
who is knowable and known) interacts
with each of the beings. Thus the
behavior of the God in human history
is controlled by human reaction to
God and to other beings and to the
created cosmos as a whole. The same
is true of every being. Every human
state is defined not only in terms
of the internal state of the being
but also in terms of the interaction
of the cosmos, co-created beings in
every plane as well as with God. We
can look upon the whole – which
includes God, Man, Creatures and
Cosmos as a whole in all its
dimensions – as one system. We
cannot isolate each individual and
attribute an absolute constant
property. Even though for
convenience we can identify and
separate the Ego of each, ultimately
we are all bound together
inseparably and that includes God as
the major factor.
We are
influenced by God. Even the small
changes in the nucleus make a lot of
changes in the system. But the
changes in each of the other
particles, however small or weak in
interaction, do produce a change in
the overall state of the system. It
does not change the nucleus much,
but there is a still a change.
God is influenced by the behavior of
his independent conscious creation.
This is evidenced in the incarnation
and the cross. The whole idea of
conscious being in the cosmos seems
to be like a network totally
interconnected. If one of the
strands is made weak or broken the
entire strand will readjust to form
a new setup.

or
as Greek Kaballa portrays it
Why we
can consider nucleus as a point is
simply because the nucleons are
bound together with extreme binding
forces produced by strong nuclear
interaction forces in contrast to
weak interaction between electrons.
Thus one of the descriptions of God
is “Rock”- something that is heavy
and therefore stable and unchanging.
Psa 18:31
For who is God, but the LORD? And
who is a rock, except our God?--
Psa 19:14
Let the words of my mouth and the
meditation of my heart be acceptable
in thy sight, O LORD, my rock
and my redeemer.
Many
Body Problem in Theology
The
problem of many free will
consciousness in a cosmos is very
much similar to the Many body
problem in Quantum theory. Most
theological structures agree that
Man (and probably many others like
angelic hierarchies) are together in
this cosmos with total free will
interacting with each other. Thus
in order to set up a solution it
will be necessary to build a state
function that represent the system.
As a first approximation we could
assume that they are separable. In
that case we could make the first
approximation of the state as a
product of the independent state
functions of each being. However
this does not take into
consideration the interaction
between these various beings. I
have developed a graphical method of
dealing with these many body
functions in 1969 to simplify these
Hartree or Hartree Fock equations.
This interaction model for four
independent beings can be drawn as
follows.
Replace this with this:
As we
can see the whole interaction field
will be enormously complicated when
the number of beings increase. Add
to this the societies and clubs with
resonant interests forming a group
that interact, family, churches etc.
The only alternative is to consider
the various methods of
approximation. One simple method
would be to find a single field to
represent the interactions. This is
the quantum potential
interpretation. Second is to
develop an average interaction field
out of the large interactions. The
nearer and more important
interactions can be considered or
asymptotically approximated. This
is the Hartree and Hartree-Fock
methods and the Born Openheimer
method. In general we assume the
important impact of God and the near
relations and events to explain our
behavior. The general potential
thus derived is called society.
Thus it is often said, the
individual is created by the
society.
The
way we can influence the individual
in a mission field is also seen
here. It can be a one to one method
– a direct evangelistic mission.
Door to door evangelism and one to
one evangelism falls in this group.
There is a more effective evangelism
in corporate influence. This is
through church groups. Individuals
get involved with the small groups
where the influence is maximized in
the field. There is however a limit
to the size of the group depending
on the radius of effective
interaction. A group bigger than
the radius of interaction will be
counter productive. In fact
factional disharmony can harm the
process.