SAKTISM

Worship of Energy or Power of creation as a female power is
common in all the cultures. As early as 4th
millennium BC Neolithic period, it has been in existence. Here
are a few examples
|

Cucuteni Culture statuette, a 4th millennium BC Late
Neolithic |

Upper Paleolithic, Venus von Willendorf,
24,000–22,000 BCE
|

This statue menhir, la Dame de Saint-Sernin,
now in musée Fenaille de Rodez was discovered in southern
France |
|

Egyptian mother goddesses Hathor and Mut (Mother)
|

The ancient culture of Aztecs had a Mother Goddess,
known as Coatlique, or Lady of the Serpent Skirt, the
creator of the world lived in the Aztlan, mountains.
She had 400 children who populated the universe |
Lucius Apuleius
writes in The Golden Ass (AD160) about Goddess, "I
am nature, the universal Mother, mistress of all elements,
primordial child of time, sovereign of all things spiritual,
queen of the dead....Though I am worshipped in many aspects,
known by countless names, propitiated with all manner of
different rites, yet the whole round earth venerates me."
Translation by Robert Graves.
These were the goddesses of
the Canaanites when the Hebrews conquered Canaan and are
referred to as the “Abomination”. Yet being an agricultural
goddess of fertility , magic and witchcraft it thrived in the
times of the period of Kings.
Evidently Saktism is a universal culture
celebrating female power who swayed every formation of culture
indirectly in a subtle way. So it is logical to assume that
similar cults existed in the Indus civilization long before the
Aryans. Indus valley civilization was also an agricultural
civilization. According to Bhattacharya it might have been in
existence in the pre-Indus cultures of Zhob Valeey and Kulli
which existed in the third millennium BC.
The Indus seals were found in Sumerian Ur attesting to the fact
that people of Sumeria and Mohenjodaro and Harappa in India were
trading partners between 2300 to 2000 B.C.

These objects found in Indus
Valley suggests some form of fertility pre-saivite cult.
However we cannot say whether they are indeed religious
artifacts or not.
This is what John Marshal the Indus Valley
archeologist has to say:
“Now of Saktism there is no direct evidence at Mohen-Jodaro or
Harappa. Let me be clear on that point. What evidence there
is, is merely suggestive. Sakthi worship was of great antiquity
in India; it originated out of the cult of the Mother Goddess,
and it is closely connected with the cult of Siva. Moreover, it
exhibits features that bear so striking resemblance to those of
certain prehistoric cults in West Asia, that we cannot pass it
by in silence or ignore the likelihood of its existence among
the Indus Valley people. The underlying principle of Saktism is
a sexual dualism which has been aptly described as “duality in
unity”. In this development of the primitive mother worship,
the goddess was transformed into a personification of female
energy (Sakti) and, as the eternal productive principle (Prakriti),
united with the eternal male principle (Purusha) and became the
creator and Mother of the Universe (Jaganmata or Jagad-amba)”
Mohenjo-Daro
and the Indus Civilization
-
John Marshal
Whatever the echoes of the past may be, Saktism in its present
form is an off shoot of medieval India most probably from among
the agricultural people rather than of the Aryan immigrants.
They eventually absorbed it around the 5th c AD
because of the confusion in the war between the gods which we
had discussed earlier as a compromise escape. Sakthi came as a
strong solution to the problem which was essentially supported
by the Advaitist monism of Sankara in the 8th
century. It saved the day for the Brahmins.
We can try to locate the Shakthi worship to vedic texts like Rig
, Yajur ans Sama Vedas in the protions written after the
Christian Era.
Rig Veda
tenth chapter includes – Sri suktham, describing the glory of goddesses, appears to be a
late supplement to the Rig Veda differing both in language and
in subject. Khilaratri sukta also mentions the Goddesses
Mahalaxmi ,Mahasaraswati and Mahakali

uttānapad,
650 CE - Badami Museum, India.
In the Rig Veda X we have description of Vedic description
Aditi which later became popular during the Gupta period as
uttānapad ("she who crouches with legs spread"), and as
Lajja Gauri idols with a faceless, lotus-headed goddess in
birthing posture. The explanation is given as:
"In the first age of the gods, existence was born from
non-existence. The quarters of the sky were born from she who
crouched with legs spread. The earth was born from she who
crouched with legs spread, and from the earth the quarters of
the sky were born."
Rigveda, X.72.3-4, cited in Doniger, p. 38.
Yajur Veda
- Shatpat Brahman (a part of the white Yajur Veda) says when
Prajapati, tired of creating beings, relaxed, Sri came forth
from him. The Gods were jealous and wanted to kill her but
Prajapati intervened and saved her life. In fact Taittirya
aranakyas (a part of the black Yajur Veda) is the first to
mention the name Durga.
Sama Veda
– is the earliest known text where Sakti is acknowledged by the
Aryans. Kena Upanishad tells of how the Aryan Gods had no
knowledge of the Brahman and failed to recognise or acknowledge
that their powers were granted by the ‘Brahman’. When Brahman
appeared before them as an Yaksha they could not recognize him.
Indra sent Agni (Fire) to find out who this Adorable Spirit is.
Brhaman placed a straw before Agni and asked him to burn it.
He was unable to burn the straw offered by the ‘Brahman’. Then
Indra send Vayu (Wind) and Vayu failed to blow it away. Finally
Indra himself went to test this unknown power and Brahman
appeared to him as Uma.
There are other Upanishads which mentions
this cult of Devi
Puranas
By
the time of Puranas Devi was probably a major force that .
-
In Ramayana, there is reference to Sri Rama performing Durga
puja befor slaying Ravana
Before starting for his
battle with Ravana, Rama wanted the blessings of Devi Durga .
He came to know that the Goddess would be pleased only if she
is worshipped with one hundred 'NeelKamal' or blue lotuses.
Rama, after travelling the whole world, could gather only
ninety nine of them. He finally decided to offer one of his
eyes, which resembled blue lotuses. Durga, being pleased with
the devotion of Rama, appeared before him and blessed him.
-
In Mahabharatha Yudhishtira offered puja to Durga before
commencing the last year of exile.
Yudishtra invokes her as the Mahisasura Mardini with 4 arms &
4 faces holding a noose, bow and arrow and a disc.
Arjuna offerd puja to Durga before the commencement of the
Mahabharata war.
Durga is mentioned in Arjun’s Hymn.
-
In Srimad Bhagavatha it is narrated how Rugmini offers puja to
Durga before marrying Krishna.
-
Markandeya Purana deals with Devi Mahaathmya and
-
Brahmanda Purana contains Lalta Sahasranama with detailed
instruction regarding the Devi worship.
Puranas were written mostly during the Gupta Period *(320-700
AD),
beginning 320 AD and Sakti appears in
various Devi forms in these writings.
Major figures introduced through the Puranas are, Mahisasura
Mardini, the fierce goddess of protection and Uma/ Sati/
Parvati/ Himavati the fertile nurturing form of the goddess.
These appeared in the various Puranas of the period such as
Markandya Purana (kills the Asuras, Madhu and Kaiatabha.),
Vamana Purana, Devi Bhagwat Purana. Siva purana, Skanda Purana
Chandi Mahatyama *celebrates the victories of the goddess under
the following names – Durga, Dasabhuja, Mahisasura Mardini,
Simhavahini, Jagadhatri, Kali, Muktakesi, Tara, Chinnamosta,
Jagad gauri.) and Varaha Purana (Siva created Kumari, with dark
skin and curly black hair, to kill Andhaka. Varaha Puran talks
of the 8th goddess Yogeshwari who leapt from the
flames emanating from Shiva’s mouth). As in most cases the
Purana period presents Sakti essentially as part of Saivism.
[“Sakti - the Mother Goddess” Dr. Manoshi Bhattacharya
http://www.the-south-asian.com/Dec2001/
Sakti%20-%20Mother%20Goddess.htm]
Even though
Dattatheya (Datta Samhita ) and Bhaskararaya contributed
heavily to the development of Sakti cult in South India, it was
Sankaracharya who really established it in India as a whole. In
his Prapancha Saara and Soundarya Lahari he established
Srichakra worship and detailed the major essences of Mantra,
Yantra and Tantra.
Devi connection was soon taken over by the Vaishnavites from the
Saivites and reinterpreted in their terms. The Devi-Bhagavata
Purana retells the tales of the Devi Mahatmya in much
greater length and detail, embellishing them with Shakta
philosophical reflections, while recasting many classic tales
from other schools of Hinduism (particularly Vaishnavism) in a
distinctly Shakta light:
"The Devi-Bhagavata was intended not only to show the
superiority of the Goddess over various male deities, but also
to clarify and elaborate on her nature on her own terms. [...]
The Goddess in the Devi-Bhagavata becomes less of a
warrior goddess, and more a nurturer and comforter of her
devotees, and a teacher of wisdom. This development in the
character of the Goddess culminates in the Devi Gita,
which "repeatedly stresses the necessity of love for the
goddess, with no mention of one's gender, as the primary
qualification," a view "inspired by the devotional ideals of
Shaktism." [Brown, C. Mackenzie. The Devi Gita: The Song of
the Goddess: A Translation, Annotation and Commentary. State
University of New York Press (Albany, 1998).]
Devi Mahatmya
also marks the birth of "independent Shaktism"; i.e. the cult of
the Female Principle as a distinct philosophical and
denominational entity.
"The influence of the cult of the Female Principle [had already]
placed goddesses by the sides of the gods of all systems as
their consorts, and symbols of their energy or shakti.
But the entire popular emotion centering round the Female
Principle was not exhausted. So need was felt for a new system,
entirely female-dominated, as system in which even the great
gods like Vishnu or Shiva would remain subordinate to the
goddess. This new system – containing vestiges of hoary
antiquity, varieties of rural and tribal cults and rituals, and
strengthened by newfangled ideas of different ages – came to be
known as Shaktism."
[Bhattacharyya, N. N., History of the Sakta
Religion, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (New
Delhi, 1974, 2d ed. 1996).]

The oldest
surviving manuscript of the Devi MÄhÄtmya, on palm-leaf, in an
early Bhujimol script, Bihar or Nepal, 11th century.



Devi
Mahatmya is the first religious text to define the Supreme
Reality (God) as a female principle. Devi Mahatmya
is found in the Markandeya Purana. Composed some 1,600
years ago, c. 400-500 CE,
Once the Trinity concept degenerated to a
constant struggle between Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesha it resulted
in the murder of Brahma leaving behind the two major sects of
Vaisnava and Saiva. The Female face the Holy Spirit of the
original Trinity took to form in the absence of Brahma and the
Sakti cult formed. It essentially started with the Saivite sect
forming a Trinity of Siva, Sakti and Ganesha as the Father, Holy
Spirit and Son. The basic Siva was then shown to be both Male
and Female before the creation in the dance of Ardha Nareeswara
(Half Woman God)


Shiva and Devi are regarded as the twofold personalization of
Brahman, the primeval substance. Which then appears as Siva
and Sakthi separated and in action. Sankara (9th C
AD) interpreted this as “Supreme, Devi holds ‘the universe in
Her womb’

The Union produced the created world. Siva without Sakti
is Sava (dead body).

(Joh
6:63)
It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail.
It represents the union of Prakriti and Energy. Together it
creates forms from nothing. This is also shown in the Linga
Yoni symbolism.
Only when Shiva is united with Shakti does he have the
power to create - Saundaryalahari

The height of worship for Devi was the period of the
Tantras, the seventh century onwards, when release was found
possible through mithuna, ‘the state of being a couple’.
http://www.bhagavadgitausa.com/KALI.htm
V.Krishnaraj gives this detailed meaning of the symbolism
“That 1 and 0 are represented in Lingam on its base. Siva is
the first ONE who said, I (Aham). That is divine Ego,
from which all individual egos came later via Sakti. Upon
telling Sakti that He is One, she accepted Her position, Zero
(0) initially. Here zero does not mean She is a non-entity. That
is when the unitary Siva-Sakti (two cotyledons in a seed) became
polarized, gendered and created the Universe and beings. Sakti
looked at Him (Pum Rupa = male form, the One) with longing eyes
(Sivon Mukhi = turning towards Siva). This is called Mithah
Samavaya, mutual agreement or obligation to begin creation.
Siva is Consciousness and Sakti is matter (Prakrti). Being ONE
(1) is being lonely. One is no more than ONE without the zero
(0). From this union of One and Zero comes all numbers,
alphabets, combinations, permutations, fractions, beings,
matter, souls, and endless possibilities.“
By the 10th – 11th
century AD she is established as an independent deity in India.

As stressed in most Tantrik teachings all things were created by
Mahamaya and from her Yoni as also all the Gods and all beings.

The Devi is Venerated by Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva

Devi becomes Adi Para Sakthi – the Primal Eternal Energy
worshipped by the Trimurthi and the gods
As in all earlier cultures this concept of sex degenerated into
various secret cultic foms involving magic, witchcraft,
immorality, and occult powers. An example of the perverted
expression of the truth, a travesty of the original practices,
is the theory of the five Makaras (Pancha Makaras);-Madya or
wine, Mamsa or flesh, Matsya or fish, Mudra or symbolical acts,
and Maithuna or coition. In order achieve this, Tantra is
declared as a secret doctrine. It is a Gupta Vidya. It then
takes many divergent forms of worship and rituals.
In Sankara’s theology here is the scheme:

As in all earlier cultures this concept of sex degenerated into
various secret cultic foms involving magic, witchcraft,
immorality, and occult powers. An example of the perverted
expression of the truth, a travesty of the original practices,
is the theory of the five Makaras (Pancha Makaras);-Madya or
wine, Mamsa or flesh, Matsya or fish, Mudra or symbolical acts,
and Maithuna or coition. In order achieve this, Tantra is
declared as a secret doctrine. It is a Gupta Vidya. It then
takes many divergent forms of worship and rituals.
According to The Brahma Yamala there are
three currents of tradition ,dakshina (right handed of Sattva
guna) , vama (left handed of Tamo guna) , and madhyama (Middle
of Rajo Guna )
Vamachara follows with pancha-makara,
the "Five Ms: Madya (Intoxicant Drink), Mamsa (Meat), Matsya
(Fish), Mudra (Cereal), and Maithuna (Sexual Intercourse).
Dakshinachara consists of traditional asceticism and
meditation.
Citations to scripture relating to Tantric and Vamachara
practice.

http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/vines/1320/vamachara_dharma.html#citations
I specifically talk about Sahajiya branch of
Gaudiya-vaishnavism and Jagannatha cult of Orissa. References
are many, U may easily find them in studies of these two
cults. What i have read myself are "Obscure Religious Cults"
by Dasgupta (still available in India) and "The Place of the
Hidden Moon - Erotic Mysticism in the Vaishnava-sahajiya Cult
of Bengal" by E. C. Dimock. Some material is present in
"Criminal Gods and Demon Devotees", an academical digest by
several scholars and some other works.
The dialogue of the priests and the queens, as if found in the
Vajasaneyi-samhita XXIII.22-31, was likewise meant to be a
part of an older ritual act in which a man, evidently a
priest, had to unite with the queen - the part played by the
horse here - and after his ceremonial sexual union he was put
to death. The Vajasaneyi verses mentioned above tell us that
the queen and the priest are to be raised up high by a few
persons and in that position they are required by the ritual
to have sexual intercourse. In Uvata’s commentary on the
Vajasaneyi-samhita, this rite is explained in greater detail.
Shatapatha-brahmana (XIII.2.7-9) also refers to the queen’s
union with the priest. This ritual was later transformed into
the Ashvamedha sacrifice in which a horse was used as a
substitute for the priest. (N. N. Bhattacharyya, History of
the Tantric Religion, New Delhi, 1987. P.124)
In certain Vedic works,
e.g., Shrautasutras of Katyayana (IV.3.17),
Gobhila-Grihyasutra (II.5.6.9-10), Taittiriya-aranyaka
(IV.7.50) to mention only a few, sexual intercourse is
regarded as a part of religious rites. Drinking of wine
appears (e.g., Shatapatha-brahmana V.1.2.9; Aitareya VII.1.5
etc.) to have been in vogue in sacrifices. The Vajapeya and
Sautramani seem to be the precursor of the Chakra of the
Tantric devotees. (Dr. Savitri Vashist, Tantra and Religion,
Jaipur, 2002, p. 92).
Tara-rahasya 3. 8: "The
one who is doing puja or japa [of Devi] without Vamachara,
goes to the terrible hell for a period of 14 lives of Indra."
…
Shvetashvatara Upanishad
(?): "Yoni of Bliss, Bliss is Brahman. Brahman is this Devi,
who is One in multitude of creation and form of Bliss in four
Purusharthas." .
Gandharva-tantra
27.36b-37a: "Bliss is the form of Brahman, which should be
known through the body.
The five Makaras are glorified as manifesting this Bliss."
Exactly the same is said
in Tantraloka of Shri Abhinavagupta (29th Ahnika).
Devi-rahasya, Uttarardha
58.11a: "Parameshvari is satisfied in the worship of Rasa of
Bliss."
Kularnava-tantra 7.101:
"By bliss Devi is satisfied, by orgasm Bhairava himself.
Agamas say: "Women are divine, women are life-breaths, women
are ornaments. One should always be with a woman, another’s or
his own."
Vamachara is literally
"following a woman" and it leads to Kamakala, essence of the
Godhead.
Kulachudamani states that "without a woman one never attains
the Perfection, thus one should take a refuge in a woman."
Meru-tantra (X.67) says: "Only he whose love (bhakti) is
strong, attains the Perfection on the Vama-path." And then
(XX.153) also: "Linga is Shiva, bhaga (vagina) is Shakti,
emission is water of Ganga. Being aware of this in sexual
enjoyment the follower of Vama achieves Liberation."
Shri Sarvananda in his "Sarvollasa"
(24. 7a) says: "One should drink wine for the sake of Bliss,
Bliss brings Liberation."
In Brihannila-tantra (8.
90) it is said: "Women are divine, women are breaths of life,
women are the ornament.
One should always unite with women, especially with
beautiful."
Gandharva-tantra (40.
51b-52a), Shrividya Agama states: "That Bliss which is born
out of union of yoni and linga,
should be known as [Bliss of] Immense Absolute and a path to
Liberation."
Kularnava 9. 50 says: "O
my Beloved! The joy derived from wine, meat and coition with
women is Liberation for the wise, but a sin for the ignorants."
Yoni-tantra (8. 2) which
says:"There is no Liberation without maithuna, such is the
verdict of Shastras."
Kali-tantra 12. 22: "O
Lady of gods, on the way of Kula Perfection is achieved not by
pujas, nyasas or snanas, but only by japa in union with a
woman."
Kali-tantra 9. 23b-24a:
"He who knows the heart of Kalika, who does Vama-sadhana with
a woman, becomes divine and achieves eternal Liberation."
Kulamrita-dipika says: "Sayujya is achieved through sexual
union, there is no doubt in this".
Vivekananda
http://www.vivekananda.btinternet.co.uk/veda11.htm
Vol.3: The Vedanta in All Its Phases, pp.340-341.
When I see how much the Vamachara [Tantra] has entered our
[Bengali] society, I find it a most disgraceful place, with
all of its boast of culture. These Vamachara sects are
honeycombing our society in Bengal. Those who come out in the
daytime and preach most loudly about achara, it is they who
carry on the horrible debauchery at night and are backed by
the most dreadful books. They are ordered by the books to do
these things. You who are of Bengal know of it. The Bengal
Shastras are the Vamachara Tantras. They are published by the
cart-load, and you poison the minds of your children with them
instead of teaching them our Shrutis. Fathers of Calcutta, do
you not feel ashamed that such horrible stuff as these
Vamachara Tantras, with translations too, should be put into
the hands of your boys and girls, and their minds poisoned,
and that they should be brought up with the idea that these
are the Shastras of the Hindus? If you are ashamed, take them
away from your children and let them read the true Shastras -
the Vedas, the Gita and the Upanishads.
It is easy to see how the ideal concepts of Holy Spirit as the
creative process in the Trinity and the idea that love is the
fulfilment of law has been high jacked into perverted forms in
the Vamachara.
Remember Dwaraka.
Remember Sodom and Gomorah.
Remember Roman and Greek Cultures.
Lest we also perish likewise.


Dwaraka Sila – witness to the
lost world